SOVIET POLICY TOWARDS THE MIDDLE EAST SINCE THE INVASION OF AFGHANISTAN
In: Journal of international affairs, Band 34, Heft 2, S. 283-310
ISSN: 0022-197X
108 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of international affairs, Band 34, Heft 2, S. 283-310
ISSN: 0022-197X
Senior scholars provide comprehensive coverage of relations between Israel and the United States since Israel's founding in 1948 through the Obama administration, including the political, religious, economic, military, and juridicial ties between the two countries
In: Israel affairs, Band 29, Heft 3, S. 492-511
ISSN: 1743-9086
In: The Journal of the Middle East and Africa, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 451-453
ISSN: 2152-0852
In: Contemporary review of the Middle East, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 102-115
ISSN: 2349-0055
Russian under President Vladimir Putin has established a strong presence in the Middle East. In fact, in 2017, Russian involvement in the regional affairs is more pronounced. Putin has done his utmost to restore Russia's prestige in the region and has been successful to an extent. Russia though for a brief period lost out to the USA, especially in the case of Iraq and Libya but its decisive intervention in Syria has changed the dynamics. If one compares the policies followed by the Soviet Union in the Middle East during the reigns of Nikita Khrushchev and Leonid Brezhnev to the present situation some interesting parallels can be drawn. However, it should be noted that the goals and policies pursued by Putin are entirely different. But in comparing the position of Russia in the Middle East under Putin to the Soviet position in the region under Khrushchev and Brezhnev is much stronger.
In: India quarterly: a journal of international affairs, Band 73, Heft 2, S. 241-250
ISSN: 0975-2684
World Affairs Online
In: Israel affairs, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 253-272
ISSN: 1743-9086
In: Bustan: the Middle East book review, Band 6, Heft 1-2, S. 154-156
ISSN: 1878-5328
In: Contemporary review of the Middle East, Band 1, Heft 3, S. 243-252
ISSN: 2349-0055
By the end of February 2014, US policy in the Middle East faced very serious challenges. Negotiations between the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority had reached an impasse, and even the indefatigable efforts of US Secretary of State John Kerry had not succeeded in getting the two sides to sign an agreement or even a framework for an agreement. In the case of Iran, the United States (US) and the other members of the P-5 plus one (UK, France, Russia, China, and Germany) had reached an interim agreement in November 2013, to limit Iran's production of enriched uranium in return for a partial lifting of sanctions, but major questions remained as negotiations began on a final agreement. These included Iran's willingness to surrender information about its suspected nuclear weaponization program; whether or not Iran would be allowed to continue to enrich uranium, and if so, how much; and the future of the Arak heavy water plant and the Fordow nuclear facility. In the case of the war in Syria, the US continued to avoid involvement, even as the death toll rose to 150,000. Despite rising calls for US action from the State Department and CIA, President Obama refused to act. His position appeared to be, "I got us out of Iraq, I'm getting us out of Afghanistan, I'm not getting us involved in Syria."
In: Bustan: the Middle East book review, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 101-108
ISSN: 1878-5328
In: The Maghreb Review, Band 36, Heft 2, S. 127-161
ISSN: 2754-6772